|
|
Post by Jdub on Nov 6, 2010 10:53:42 GMT -5
sshould i trade ..
Hakeem nicks
4
Brandon Lloyd & Vincent Jackson
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Nov 6, 2010 12:03:25 GMT -5
rest of the team?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jdub on Nov 6, 2010 12:15:36 GMT -5
QB Jay Cutler
QB David Garrard
RB Legarrant Blount
RB Joseph Addai
WR Austin Collie
WR Braylon Edwards
WR Hakeem nicks
TE Antonio Gates
K Matt Bryant
D # = Cardinals
|
|
|
|
Post by dogthebountyhunter on Nov 6, 2010 13:36:19 GMT -5
yes, v-jaq and lloyd are both better let alone getting them both just for em. Your WR needs the depth aswell.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Nov 6, 2010 13:47:25 GMT -5
ya seems like a good deal
altho i don't have the foggiest about how braylon is performing
|
|
|
|
Post by ebreeze on Nov 6, 2010 16:19:09 GMT -5
I wouldn't
|
|
|
|
Post by dogthebountyhunter on Nov 6, 2010 16:37:11 GMT -5
you wouldn't take the NFL's leading WR in yards AND V-jaq for nicks? why not?
|
|
|
|
Post by ebreeze on Nov 6, 2010 16:48:32 GMT -5
you wouldn't take the NFL's leading WR in yards AND V-jaq for nicks? why not? Because Nicks has twice as many TDs and Llyod. Llyod has more Fantasy points true, but just by 11. |
|
|
|
Post by dogthebountyhunter on Nov 6, 2010 16:54:23 GMT -5
and hes getting v-jaq. Even if nicks and lloyd are even hes still getin v-jaq with it who will help his clearly bad WR core.
|
|
|
|
Post by ebreeze on Nov 6, 2010 16:55:05 GMT -5
and hes getting v-jaq. Even if nicks and lloyd are even hes still getin v-jaq with it who will help his clearly bad WR core. Because I don't need v-jax Thats why. |
|
2 QUIT
