|
Post by admin on Jan 20, 2011 23:25:31 GMT -5
Jets @ Steelers
You can't deny that the Jets have momentum. The problem is that they are facing the Steelers. A young QB like Mark Sanchez may be shaken up by Polamalu if he gets it going, we've all seen how Mark breaks down depending on the game. One thing is certain, the Jets rushing game is gonna have a hard time here, making Sanchez pass a lot more, and there's where the game will be decided: If Sanchez manages to continue his matured level of playing, they will have a good shot at it. If he doesn't, well... Better luck next year. As for the Steelers, Mendenhall isn't too good of a RB to be able to have a good game vs. the Jets, so it's gonna be Big Ben passing, and I don't see it working very well. Jets upset 19-16
Packers @ Bears
Remember what I said last week about a good pass rush? Jay Cutler, meet Clay Matthews. The Packers defence will manage to frustrate the Bears plans over and over. Rodgers is more than used to pressure, and shouldn't have a problem dealing with the Bears secondary, I don't see a Packers run game working very well, but their gonna air it out for a huge game once again. Packers win 31-20
|
|
Neo
Rookie
Posts: 20
|
Post by Neo on Jan 23, 2011 23:37:41 GMT -5
2-0. Flex-
My superbowl pick will be a little later if i can get some more info on da steelers probowl center (didnt look like it was good though)
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jan 24, 2011 0:40:46 GMT -5
It's quite obvious that I was cheering for Jets, but still, I had Jets winning so, my bad, sorry
Steelers had an obvious matchup advantage today and they won it, simple as that. I'm sorry that we are having a boring, one-sided, Packers, matchup on the superbowl, but that's how it's gonna go down
|
|
Neo
Rookie
Posts: 20
|
Post by Neo on Jan 24, 2011 0:55:10 GMT -5
I don't see how its one sided. Steelers got a good secondary and can't see Packers getting much run game goin. Also Steelers O looks like a pretty good match up vs Packers D with a balance of run and pass (as we seen today). Should be a good one.
|
|
Neo
Rookie
Posts: 20
|
Post by Neo on Jan 24, 2011 2:06:03 GMT -5
but i do want the packers to win.
who dosen't like the who does a championship belt when he rushes in for a td?
|
|
Neo
Rookie
Posts: 20
|
Post by Neo on Jan 24, 2011 2:58:27 GMT -5
Interesting stat. There isnt a single player on the Packers that has won a superbowl!
idk how many won on Steelers, prly be eaiser to find out who hasn't won one.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jan 24, 2011 23:40:15 GMT -5
Superbowl - Packers vs. Steelers
Like I said before, Steelers don't have a CRAZY good secondary, yes they have Polamalu, but the Packers will get around it, they have just too many weapons on the aerial game and they don't rely on the rushing heavily, rendering the Steelers huge run stopping useless. As for defence, they have just the right balance to keep Roethlisberger and Wallace away from big plays, keep a decent pressure and stop the run game. I figure they'll trade FGs for TDs and Packers walk away with this one. Packers win 24-13
|
|
Neo
Rookie
Posts: 20
|
Post by Neo on Feb 2, 2011 8:50:53 GMT -5
My Superbowl pick! I think Rodgers and the O could struggle a bit vs the Steelers but not enough to hurt em to bad. I think the Steelers passing game and run game will struggle more then the Packers O will. I got the Packers winning a close one 28-25. I think field goal kicking will be key in this one and i dont trust sean suisham one bit.
|
|